March 03, 2004

“Here we had targets, we had opportunities, we had a country willing to support casualties, or risk casualties after 9/11 and we still didn’t do it,” said Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst with the Brookings Institution.

This news story is extraordinary in several ways:
1) the timing of its release -- the night Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mekong Delta) clinched the Democractic nomination, two days before the Bush cabal's TV ad blitz (CODENAME: Operation Carpet Bombing) and less than 24 hours after a wave of Al-Qaeda bombings that took the lives of at least 140 Iraqis and resulted in the stoning of US soldiers
2) the news organization that broke the story -- GE's NotBeSeen (NBC) Nightly News, which has not been a friend of the Truth over the last four years
3) the source -- this blockbuster could only have come from the US military and/or US intelligence communities, the one burdened with an unnecessary and debilitating quagmire that is spilling our blood and treasure in the sand, and the other scapgoated for "intelligence failures" when its best guestimates proved accurate, i.e. Saddam was not an imminent threat, or, of course, from someone on the National Security Council or formerly on the National Security Council. Hmmm. Who would that list include?
4) this story did not break in the British papers, and then filter through to the US via the Information Rebellion to be begrudgingly and prefunctorily mentioned in passing by the "US mainstream news media," indeed, quite the opposite
Yes, the woods are coming to the castle walls...

Jim Miklaszewski, NBC: With Tuesday’s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq. But NBC News has learned that long before the war the Bush administration had several chances to wipe out his terrorist operation and perhaps kill Zarqawi himself — but never pulled the trigger...“Here we had targets, we had opportunities, we had a country willing to support casualties, or risk casualties after 9/11 and we still didn’t do it,” said Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst with the Brookings Institution.

Repudiate the 9/11 Cover-Up and the Iraq War Lies, Show Up for Democracy in 2004: Defeat Bush (again!)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601/

Avoiding attacking suspected terrorist mastermind Abu Musab Zarqawi blamed for more than 700 killings in Iraq
By Jim Miklaszewski
Correspondent
NBC News
Updated: 7:14 p.m. ET March 02, 2004
With Tuesday’s attacks, Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian militant with ties to al-Qaida, is now blamed for more than 700 terrorist killings in Iraq. But NBC News has learned that long before the war the Bush administration had several chances to wipe out his terrorist operation and perhaps kill Zarqawi himself — but never pulled the trigger.

In June 2002, U.S. officials say intelligence had revealed that Zarqawi and members of al-Qaida had set up a weapons lab at Kirma, in northern Iraq, producing deadly ricin and cyanide.

The Pentagon quickly drafted plans to attack the camp with cruise missiles and airstrikes and sent it to the White House, where, according to U.S. government sources, the plan was debated to death in the National Security Council.

‘People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the president’s policy of pre-emption against terrorists.’


— Roger Cressey
Terrorism expert


“Here we had targets, we had opportunities, we had a country willing to support casualties, or risk casualties after 9/11 and we still didn’t do it,” said Michael O’Hanlon, military analyst with the Brookings Institution.

Four months later, intelligence showed Zarqawi was planning to use ricin in terrorist attacks in Europe.

The Pentagon drew up a second strike plan, and the White House again killed it. By then the administration had set its course for war with Iraq.

“People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the president’s policy of preemption against terrorists,” according to terrorism expert and former National Security Council member Roger Cressey.

In January 2003, the threat turned real. Police in London arrested six terror suspects and discovered a ricin lab connected to the camp in Iraq.

The Pentagon drew up still another attack plan, and for the third time, the National Security Council killed it.

Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.

The United States did attack the camp at Kirma at the beginning of the war, but it was too late — Zarqawi and many of his followers were gone. “Here’s a case where they waited, they waited too long and now we’re suffering as a result inside Iraq,” Cressey added.

And despite the Bush administration’s tough talk about hitting the terrorists before they strike, Zarqawi’s killing streak continues today.

© 2004 MSNBC Interactive
MORE FROM NIGHTLY NEWS WITH TOM BROKAW

Posted by richard at March 3, 2004 10:45 PM